Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cannabinoids for medical use: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Penny F. Whiting
  • , Robert F. Wolff
  • , Sohan Deshpande
  • , Marcello Di Nisio
  • , Steven Duffy
  • , Adrian V. Hernandez
  • , J. Christiaan Keurentjes
  • , Shona Lang
  • , Kate Misso
  • , Steve Ryder
  • , Simone Schmidlkofer
  • , Marie Westwood
  • , Jos Kleijnen
  • University of Bristol
  • University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
  • Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd
  • Gabriele d'Annunzio University
  • Academic Medical Center
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • Radboud University Nijmegen
  • Cepicon GmbH
  • University of Maastricht

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1930 Scopus citations

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Cannabis and cannabinoid drugs are widely used to treat disease or alleviate symptoms, but their efficacy for specific indications is not clear. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of the benefits and adverse events (AEs) of cannabinoids. DATA SOURCES: Twenty-eight databases from inception to April 2015. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized clinical trials of cannabinoids for the following indications: nausea and vomiting due to chemotherapy, appetite stimulation in HIV/AIDS, chronic pain, spasticity due to multiple sclerosis or paraplegia, depression, anxiety disorder, sleep disorder, psychosis, glaucoma, or Tourette syndrome. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. All review stages were conducted independently by 2 reviewers. Where possible, data were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Patient-relevant/disease-specific outcomes, activities of daily living, quality of life, global impression of change, and AEs. RESULTS: A total of 79 trials (6462 participants) were included; 4 were judged at low risk of bias. Most trials showed improvement in symptoms associated with cannabinoids but these associations did not reach statistical significance in all trials. Compared with placebo, cannabinoids were associated with a greater average number of patients showing a complete nausea and vomiting response (47% vs 20%; odds ratio [OR], 3.82 [95% CI, 1.55-9.42]; 3 trials), reduction in pain (37% vs 31%; OR, 1.41 [95% CI, 0.99-2.00]; 8 trials), a greater average reduction in numerical rating scale pain assessment (on a 0-10-point scale; weighted mean difference [WMD], -0.46 [95% CI, -0.80 to -0.11]; 6 trials), and average reduction in the Ashworth spasticity scale (WMD, -0.36 [95% CI, -0.69 to -0.05]; 7 trials). There was an increased risk of short-term AEs with cannabinoids, including serious AEs. Common AEs included dizziness, dry mouth, nausea, fatigue, somnolence, euphoria, vomiting, disorientation, drowsiness, confusion, loss of balance, and hallucination. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: There was moderate-quality evidence to support the use of cannabinoids for the treatment of chronic pain and spasticity. There was low-quality evidence suggesting that cannabinoids were associated with improvements in nausea and vomiting due to chemotherapy, weight gain in HIV infection, sleep disorders, and Tourette syndrome. Cannabinoids were associated with an increased risk of short-term AEs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2456-2473
Number of pages18
JournalJAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
Volume313
Issue number24
DOIs
StatePublished - 23 Jun 2015

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cannabinoids for medical use: A systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this