Abstract
University students may encounter situations where they perform poorly in a course and contemplate dropping out. This intention to drop out of a course manifests not only in thoughts or ideas but also in a cognitive self-evaluation of their performance and skills, enabling them to reflect on the possibility of dropping out. In this sense, there is a shortage of instruments that evaluate the intention to drop out of a course, so the aim was to develop and validate the Course Dropout Intention Scale (CDIS). Data from two samples (N1 = 198; N2 = 675) were used; the first was for the EFA, and the second was for the CFA, GRM, and SEM. The one-factor model was derived from the EFA and confirmed in the second sample, exhibiting appropriate goodness-of-fit indices. Similarly, the GRM obtained adequate fit indices; all items discriminated adequately, and the difficulty parameter had a monotonic increase. The SEM model of the effect of satisfaction with studies on the CDIS showed a negative and statistically significant effect. Thus, it was demonstrated that the CDIS is a robust instrument in its psychometric properties and empirical evidence with other variables.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 103-113 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | European Journal of Educational Research |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 2024 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Brief measure
- college student
- course dropout
- dropout intention
- dropout studies
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Course Dropout Intention Scale: Development and Validation of a New Brief Measure in Academic College Context'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver