Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine for treatment or prophylaxis of COVID-19: A living systematic review

  • Adrian V. Hernandez
  • , Yuani M. Roman
  • , Vinay Pasupuleti
  • , Joshuan J. Barboza
  • , C. Michael White
  • University of Connecticut
  • obtuvo un doctorado en la de Maryland y realizó un postdoctorado de la Universidad de Toronto. Es docente-investigador en la Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
  • MedErgy Health Group Inc.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

173 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine have antiviral effects in vitro against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Purpose: To summarize evidence about the benefits and harms of hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine for the treatment or prophylaxis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Data Sources: PubMed (via MEDLINE), EMBASE (via Ovid), Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, bioRxiv, Preprints, ClinicalTrials.gov, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry from 1 December 2019 until 8 May 2020. Study Selection: Studies in any language reporting efficacy or safety outcomes from hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine use in any setting in adults or children with suspected COVID-19 or at risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Data Extraction: Independent, dually performed data extraction and quality assessments. Data Synthesis: Four randomized controlled trials, 10 cohort studies, and 9 case series assessed treatment effects of the medications, but no studies evaluated prophylaxis. Evidence was conflicting and insufficient regarding the effect of hydroxychloroquine on such outcomes as all-cause mortality, progression to severe disease, clinical symptoms, and upper respiratory virologic clearance with antigen testing. Several studies found that patients receiving hydroxychloroquine developed a QTc interval of 500 ms or greater, but the proportion of patients with this finding varied among the studies. Two studies assessed the efficacy of chloroquine; 1 trial, which compared higher-dose (600 mg twice daily for 10 days) with lower-dose (450 mg twice daily on day 1 and once daily for 4 days) therapy, was stopped owing to concern that the higher dose therapy increased lethality and QTc interval prolongation. An observational study that compared adults with COVID-19 receiving chloroquine phosphate, 500 mg once or twice daily, with patients not receiving chloroquine found minor fever resolution and virologic clearance benefits with chloroquine. Limitation: There were few controlled studies, and control for confounding was inadequate in observational studies. Conclusion: Evidence on the benefits and harms of using hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine to treat COVID-19 is very weak and conflicting. Primary Funding Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)287-297
Number of pages11
JournalAnnals of Internal Medicine
Volume173
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 18 Aug 2020
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine for treatment or prophylaxis of COVID-19: A living systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this