Lives versus Livelihoods? Perceived economic risk has a stronger association with support for COVID-19 preventive measures than perceived health risk

Claudia F. Nisa; Jocelyn J. Bélanger; Daiane G. Faller; Nicholas R. Buttrick; Jochen O. Mierau; Maura M.K. Austin; Birga M. Schumpe; Edyta M. Sasin; Maximilian Agostini; Ben Gützkow; Jannis Kreienkamp; Georgios Abakoumkin; Jamilah Hanum Abdul Khaiyom; Vjollca Ahmedi; Handan Akkas; Carlos A. Almenara; Mohsin Atta; Sabahat Cigdem Bagci; Sima Basel; Edona Berisha Kida; Allan B.I. Bernardo; Phatthanakit Chobthamkit; Hoon Seok Choi; Mioara Cristea; Sára Csaba; Kaja Damnjanović; Ivan Danyliuk; Arobindu Dash; Daniela Di Santo; Karen M. Douglas; Violeta Enea; Gavan Fitzsimons; Alexandra Gheorghiu; Ángel Gómez; Joanna Grzymala-Moszczynska; Ali Hamaidia; Qing Han; Mai Helmy; Joevarian Hudiyana; Bertus F. Jeronimus; Ding Yu Jiang; Veljko Jovanović; Željka Kamenov; Anna Kende; Shian Ling Keng; Tra Thi Thanh Kieu; Yasin Koc; Kamila Kovyazina; Inna Kozytska; Joshua Krause; Arie W. Kruglanski; Anton Kurapov; Maja Kutlaca; Nóra Anna Lantos; Edward P. Lemay; Cokorda Bagus Jaya Lesmana; Winnifred R. Louis; Adrian Lueders; Najma Iqbal Malik; Anton Martinez; Kira O. McCabe; Jasmina Mehulić; Mirra Noor Milla; Idris Mohammed; Erica Molinario; Manuel Moyano; Hayat Muhammad; Silvana Mula; Hamdi Muluk; Solomiia Myroniuk; Reza Najafi; Boglárka Nyúl; Paul A. O’Keefe; Jose Javier Olivas Osuna; Evgeny N. Osin; Joonha Park; Gennaro Pica; Antonio Pierro; Jonas Rees; Anne Margit Reitsema; Elena Resta; Marika Rullo; Michelle K. Ryan; Adil Samekin; Pekka Santtila; Heyla A. Selim; Michael Vicente Stanton; Samiah Sultana; Robbie M. Sutton; Eleftheria Tseliou; Akira Utsugi; Jolien Anne van Breen; Caspar J. Van Lissa; Kees Van Veen; Michelle R. vanDellen; Alexandra Vázquez; Robin Wollast; Victoria Wai lan Yeung; Somayeh Zand; Iris Lav Žeželj; Bang Zheng; Andreas Zick; Claudia Zúñiga; N. Pontus Leander

doi:10.1038/s41598-021-88314-4

Lives versus Livelihoods? Perceived economic risk has a stronger association with support for COVID-19 preventive measures than perceived health risk

Claudia F. Nisa
, Jocelyn J. Bélanger
, Daiane G. Faller
, Nicholas R. Buttrick
, Jochen O. Mierau
, Maura M.K. Austin
, Birga M. Schumpe
, Edyta M. Sasin
, Maximilian Agostini
, Ben Gützkow
, Jannis Kreienkamp
, Georgios Abakoumkin
, Jamilah Hanum Abdul Khaiyom
, Vjollca Ahmedi
, Handan Akkas
, Carlos A. Almenara
, Mohsin Atta
, Sabahat Cigdem Bagci
, Sima Basel
, Edona Berisha Kida

Allan B.I. Bernardo, Phatthanakit Chobthamkit, Hoon Seok Choi, Mioara Cristea, Sára Csaba, Kaja Damnjanović, Ivan Danyliuk, Arobindu Dash, Daniela Di Santo, Karen M. Douglas, Violeta Enea, Gavan Fitzsimons, Alexandra Gheorghiu, Ángel Gómez, Joanna Grzymala-Moszczynska, Ali Hamaidia, Qing Han, Mai Helmy, Joevarian Hudiyana, Bertus F. Jeronimus, Ding Yu Jiang, Veljko Jovanović, Željka Kamenov, Anna Kende, Shian Ling Keng, Tra Thi Thanh Kieu, Yasin Koc, Kamila Kovyazina, Inna Kozytska, Joshua Krause, Arie W. Kruglanski, Anton Kurapov, Maja Kutlaca, Nóra Anna Lantos, Edward P. Lemay, Cokorda Bagus Jaya Lesmana, Winnifred R. Louis, Adrian Lueders, Najma Iqbal Malik, Anton Martinez, Kira O. McCabe, Jasmina Mehulić, Mirra Noor Milla, Idris Mohammed, Erica Molinario, Manuel Moyano, Hayat Muhammad, Silvana Mula, Hamdi Muluk, Solomiia Myroniuk, Reza Najafi, Boglárka Nyúl, Paul A. O’Keefe, Jose Javier Olivas Osuna, Evgeny N. Osin, Joonha Park, Gennaro Pica, Antonio Pierro, Jonas Rees, Anne Margit Reitsema, Elena Resta, Marika Rullo, Michelle K. Ryan, Adil Samekin, Pekka Santtila, Heyla A. Selim, Michael Vicente Stanton, Samiah Sultana, Robbie M. Sutton, Eleftheria Tseliou, Akira Utsugi, Jolien Anne van Breen, Caspar J. Van Lissa, Kees Van Veen, Michelle R. vanDellen, Alexandra Vázquez, Robin Wollast, Victoria Wai lan Yeung, Somayeh Zand, Iris Lav Žeželj, Bang Zheng, Andreas Zick, Claudia Zúñiga, N. Pontus Leander

New York University Abu Dhabi
University of Virginia
University of Groningen
University of Amsterdam
University of Thessaly
International Islamic University Malaysia
Pristine University
Ankara Science University
University of Sargodha
Sabanci University
De La Salle University
Thammasat University
Sungkyunkwan University
Heriot-Watt University
Eötvös Loránd University
University of Belgrade
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Leuphana University of Lüneburg
University ‘La Sapienza'’
University of Kent
Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iaşi
Duke University
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
Jagiellonian University in Kraków
University Setif 2
University of Bristol
Menoufia University
University of Indonesia
National Chung Cheng University
University of Novi Sad
University of Zagreb
Yale-NUS College
HCMC University of Education
Independent Researcher
University of Maryland, College Park
Durham University
Udayana University
University of Queensland
Université Clermont Auvergne
University of Sheffield
Vanderbilt University
Usmanu Danfodiyo University
University of Córdoba
University of Peshawar
Islamic Azad University, Rasht Branch
Higher School of Economics
NUCB Business School
University of Camerino
University of Bielefeld
University of Siena
University of Exeter
International Islamic Academy of Uzbekistan
New York University Shanghai
King Saud University
California State University East Bay
Nagoya University
Leiden University
Utrecht University
University of Georgia
Lingnan University, Hong Kong
Imperial College London
Universidad de Chile

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper examines whether compliance with COVID-19 mitigation measures is motivated by wanting to save lives or save the economy (or both), and which implications this carries to fight the pandemic. National representative samples were collected from 24 countries (N = 25,435). The main predictors were (1) perceived risk to contract coronavirus, (2) perceived risk to suffer economic losses due to coronavirus, and (3) their interaction effect. Individual and country-level variables were added as covariates in multilevel regression models. We examined compliance with various preventive health behaviors and support for strict containment policies. Results show that perceived economic risk consistently predicted mitigation behavior and policy support—and its effects were positive. Perceived health risk had mixed effects. Only two significant interactions between health and economic risk were identified—both positive.

Original language	English
Article number	9669
Journal	Scientific Reports
Volume	11
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88314-4
State	Published - Dec 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Access to Document

10.1038/s41598-021-88314-4

Cite this

Nisa, C. F., Bélanger, J. J., Faller, D. G., Buttrick, N. R., Mierau, J. O., Austin, M. M. K., Schumpe, B. M., Sasin, E. M., Agostini, M., Gützkow, B., Kreienkamp, J., Abakoumkin, G., Abdul Khaiyom, J. H., Ahmedi, V., Akkas, H., Almenara, C. A., Atta, M., Bagci, S. C., Basel, S., ... Leander, N. P. (2021). Lives versus Livelihoods? Perceived economic risk has a stronger association with support for COVID-19 preventive measures than perceived health risk. Scientific Reports, 11(1), Article 9669. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88314-4

@article{4200084bc04242ab9b4672033fa0949f,

title = "Lives versus Livelihoods? Perceived economic risk has a stronger association with support for COVID-19 preventive measures than perceived health risk",

abstract = "This paper examines whether compliance with COVID-19 mitigation measures is motivated by wanting to save lives or save the economy (or both), and which implications this carries to fight the pandemic. National representative samples were collected from 24 countries (N = 25,435). The main predictors were (1) perceived risk to contract coronavirus, (2) perceived risk to suffer economic losses due to coronavirus, and (3) their interaction effect. Individual and country-level variables were added as covariates in multilevel regression models. We examined compliance with various preventive health behaviors and support for strict containment policies. Results show that perceived economic risk consistently predicted mitigation behavior and policy support—and its effects were positive. Perceived health risk had mixed effects. Only two significant interactions between health and economic risk were identified—both positive.",

author = "Nisa, \{Claudia F.\} and B{\'e}langer, \{Jocelyn J.\} and Faller, \{Daiane G.\} and Buttrick, \{Nicholas R.\} and Mierau, \{Jochen O.\} and Austin, \{Maura M.K.\} and Schumpe, \{Birga M.\} and Sasin, \{Edyta M.\} and Maximilian Agostini and Ben G{\"u}tzkow and Jannis Kreienkamp and Georgios Abakoumkin and \{Abdul Khaiyom\}, \{Jamilah Hanum\} and Vjollca Ahmedi and Handan Akkas and Almenara, \{Carlos A.\} and Mohsin Atta and Bagci, \{Sabahat Cigdem\} and Sima Basel and Kida, \{Edona Berisha\} and Bernardo, \{Allan B.I.\} and Phatthanakit Chobthamkit and Choi, \{Hoon Seok\} and Mioara Cristea and S{\'a}ra Csaba and Kaja Damnjanovi{\'c} and Ivan Danyliuk and Arobindu Dash and \{Di Santo\}, Daniela and Douglas, \{Karen M.\} and Violeta Enea and Gavan Fitzsimons and Alexandra Gheorghiu and {\'A}ngel G{\'o}mez and Joanna Grzymala-Moszczynska and Ali Hamaidia and Qing Han and Mai Helmy and Joevarian Hudiyana and Jeronimus, \{Bertus F.\} and Jiang, \{Ding Yu\} and Veljko Jovanovi{\'c} and {\v Z}eljka Kamenov and Anna Kende and Keng, \{Shian Ling\} and Kieu, \{Tra Thi Thanh\} and Yasin Koc and Kamila Kovyazina and Inna Kozytska and Joshua Krause and Kruglanski, \{Arie W.\} and Anton Kurapov and Maja Kutlaca and Lantos, \{N{\'o}ra Anna\} and Lemay, \{Edward P.\} and Lesmana, \{Cokorda Bagus Jaya\} and Louis, \{Winnifred R.\} and Adrian Lueders and Malik, \{Najma Iqbal\} and Anton Martinez and McCabe, \{Kira O.\} and Jasmina Mehuli{\'c} and Milla, \{Mirra Noor\} and Idris Mohammed and Erica Molinario and Manuel Moyano and Hayat Muhammad and Silvana Mula and Hamdi Muluk and Solomiia Myroniuk and Reza Najafi and Bogl{\'a}rka Ny{\'u}l and O{\textquoteright}Keefe, \{Paul A.\} and Osuna, \{Jose Javier Olivas\} and Osin, \{Evgeny N.\} and Joonha Park and Gennaro Pica and Antonio Pierro and Jonas Rees and Reitsema, \{Anne Margit\} and Elena Resta and Marika Rullo and Ryan, \{Michelle K.\} and Adil Samekin and Pekka Santtila and Selim, \{Heyla A.\} and Stanton, \{Michael Vicente\} and Samiah Sultana and Sutton, \{Robbie M.\} and Eleftheria Tseliou and Akira Utsugi and \{van Breen\}, \{Jolien Anne\} and \{Van Lissa\}, \{Caspar J.\} and \{Van Veen\}, Kees and vanDellen, \{Michelle R.\} and Alexandra V{\'a}zquez and Robin Wollast and Yeung, \{Victoria Wai lan\} and Somayeh Zand and {\v Z}e{\v z}elj, \{Iris Lav\} and Bang Zheng and Andreas Zick and Claudia Z{\'u}{\~n}iga and Leander, \{N. Pontus\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021, The Author(s).",

year = "2021",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1038/s41598-021-88314-4",

language = "Ingl{\'e}s",

volume = "11",

journal = "Scientific Reports",

issn = "2045-2322",

publisher = "Nature Research",

number = "1",

}

Nisa, CF, Bélanger, JJ, Faller, DG, Buttrick, NR, Mierau, JO, Austin, MMK, Schumpe, BM, Sasin, EM, Agostini, M, Gützkow, B, Kreienkamp, J, Abakoumkin, G, Abdul Khaiyom, JH, Ahmedi, V, Akkas, H, Almenara, CA, Atta, M, Bagci, SC, Basel, S, Kida, EB, Bernardo, ABI, Chobthamkit, P, Choi, HS, Cristea, M, Csaba, S, Damnjanović, K, Danyliuk, I, Dash, A, Di Santo, D, Douglas, KM, Enea, V, Fitzsimons, G, Gheorghiu, A, Gómez, Á, Grzymala-Moszczynska, J, Hamaidia, A, Han, Q, Helmy, M, Hudiyana, J, Jeronimus, BF, Jiang, DY, Jovanović, V, Kamenov, Ž, Kende, A, Keng, SL, Kieu, TTT, Koc, Y, Kovyazina, K, Kozytska, I, Krause, J, Kruglanski, AW, Kurapov, A, Kutlaca, M, Lantos, NA, Lemay, EP, Lesmana, CBJ, Louis, WR, Lueders, A, Malik, NI, Martinez, A, McCabe, KO, Mehulić, J, Milla, MN, Mohammed, I, Molinario, E, Moyano, M, Muhammad, H, Mula, S, Muluk, H, Myroniuk, S, Najafi, R, Nyúl, B, O’Keefe, PA, Osuna, JJO, Osin, EN, Park, J, Pica, G, Pierro, A, Rees, J, Reitsema, AM, Resta, E, Rullo, M, Ryan, MK, Samekin, A, Santtila, P, Selim, HA, Stanton, MV, Sultana, S, Sutton, RM, Tseliou, E, Utsugi, A, van Breen, JA, Van Lissa, CJ, Van Veen, K, vanDellen, MR, Vázquez, A, Wollast, R, Yeung, VWL, Zand, S, Žeželj, IL, Zheng, B, Zick, A, Zúñiga, C & Leander, NP 2021, 'Lives versus Livelihoods? Perceived economic risk has a stronger association with support for COVID-19 preventive measures than perceived health risk', Scientific Reports, vol. 11, no. 1, 9669. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88314-4

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lives versus Livelihoods? Perceived economic risk has a stronger association with support for COVID-19 preventive measures than perceived health risk

AU - Nisa, Claudia F.

AU - Bélanger, Jocelyn J.

AU - Faller, Daiane G.

AU - Buttrick, Nicholas R.

AU - Mierau, Jochen O.

AU - Austin, Maura M.K.

AU - Schumpe, Birga M.

AU - Sasin, Edyta M.

AU - Agostini, Maximilian

AU - Gützkow, Ben

AU - Kreienkamp, Jannis

AU - Abakoumkin, Georgios

AU - Abdul Khaiyom, Jamilah Hanum

AU - Ahmedi, Vjollca

AU - Akkas, Handan

AU - Almenara, Carlos A.

AU - Atta, Mohsin

AU - Bagci, Sabahat Cigdem

AU - Basel, Sima

AU - Kida, Edona Berisha

AU - Bernardo, Allan B.I.

AU - Chobthamkit, Phatthanakit

AU - Choi, Hoon Seok

AU - Cristea, Mioara

AU - Csaba, Sára

AU - Damnjanović, Kaja

AU - Danyliuk, Ivan

AU - Dash, Arobindu

AU - Di Santo, Daniela

AU - Douglas, Karen M.

AU - Enea, Violeta

AU - Fitzsimons, Gavan

AU - Gheorghiu, Alexandra

AU - Gómez, Ángel

AU - Grzymala-Moszczynska, Joanna

AU - Hamaidia, Ali

AU - Han, Qing

AU - Helmy, Mai

AU - Hudiyana, Joevarian

AU - Jeronimus, Bertus F.

AU - Jiang, Ding Yu

AU - Jovanović, Veljko

AU - Kamenov, Željka

AU - Kende, Anna

AU - Keng, Shian Ling

AU - Kieu, Tra Thi Thanh

AU - Koc, Yasin

AU - Kovyazina, Kamila

AU - Kozytska, Inna

AU - Krause, Joshua

AU - Kruglanski, Arie W.

AU - Kurapov, Anton

AU - Kutlaca, Maja

AU - Lantos, Nóra Anna

AU - Lemay, Edward P.

AU - Lesmana, Cokorda Bagus Jaya

AU - Louis, Winnifred R.

AU - Lueders, Adrian

AU - Malik, Najma Iqbal

AU - Martinez, Anton

AU - McCabe, Kira O.

AU - Mehulić, Jasmina

AU - Milla, Mirra Noor

AU - Mohammed, Idris

AU - Molinario, Erica

AU - Moyano, Manuel

AU - Muhammad, Hayat

AU - Mula, Silvana

AU - Muluk, Hamdi

AU - Myroniuk, Solomiia

AU - Najafi, Reza

AU - Nyúl, Boglárka

AU - O’Keefe, Paul A.

AU - Osuna, Jose Javier Olivas

AU - Osin, Evgeny N.

AU - Park, Joonha

AU - Pica, Gennaro

AU - Pierro, Antonio

AU - Rees, Jonas

AU - Reitsema, Anne Margit

AU - Resta, Elena

AU - Rullo, Marika

AU - Ryan, Michelle K.

AU - Samekin, Adil

AU - Santtila, Pekka

AU - Selim, Heyla A.

AU - Stanton, Michael Vicente

AU - Sultana, Samiah

AU - Sutton, Robbie M.

AU - Tseliou, Eleftheria

AU - Utsugi, Akira

AU - van Breen, Jolien Anne

AU - Van Lissa, Caspar J.

AU - Van Veen, Kees

AU - vanDellen, Michelle R.

AU - Vázquez, Alexandra

AU - Wollast, Robin

AU - Yeung, Victoria Wai lan

AU - Zand, Somayeh

AU - Žeželj, Iris Lav

AU - Zheng, Bang

AU - Zick, Andreas

AU - Zúñiga, Claudia

AU - Leander, N. Pontus

PY - 2021/12

Y1 - 2021/12

N2 - This paper examines whether compliance with COVID-19 mitigation measures is motivated by wanting to save lives or save the economy (or both), and which implications this carries to fight the pandemic. National representative samples were collected from 24 countries (N = 25,435). The main predictors were (1) perceived risk to contract coronavirus, (2) perceived risk to suffer economic losses due to coronavirus, and (3) their interaction effect. Individual and country-level variables were added as covariates in multilevel regression models. We examined compliance with various preventive health behaviors and support for strict containment policies. Results show that perceived economic risk consistently predicted mitigation behavior and policy support—and its effects were positive. Perceived health risk had mixed effects. Only two significant interactions between health and economic risk were identified—both positive.

AB - This paper examines whether compliance with COVID-19 mitigation measures is motivated by wanting to save lives or save the economy (or both), and which implications this carries to fight the pandemic. National representative samples were collected from 24 countries (N = 25,435). The main predictors were (1) perceived risk to contract coronavirus, (2) perceived risk to suffer economic losses due to coronavirus, and (3) their interaction effect. Individual and country-level variables were added as covariates in multilevel regression models. We examined compliance with various preventive health behaviors and support for strict containment policies. Results show that perceived economic risk consistently predicted mitigation behavior and policy support—and its effects were positive. Perceived health risk had mixed effects. Only two significant interactions between health and economic risk were identified—both positive.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85105459494

U2 - 10.1038/s41598-021-88314-4

DO - 10.1038/s41598-021-88314-4

M3 - Artículo

C2 - 33958617

AN - SCOPUS:85105459494

SN - 2045-2322

VL - 11

JO - Scientific Reports

JF - Scientific Reports

IS - 1

M1 - 9669

ER -

Lives versus Livelihoods? Perceived economic risk has a stronger association with support for COVID-19 preventive measures than perceived health risk

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this