Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Plagiarism, Cheating and Research Integrity: Case Studies from a Masters Program in Peru

  • Andres M. Carnero
  • , Percy Mayta-Tristan
  • , Kelika A. Konda
  • , Edward Mezones-Holguin
  • , Antonio Bernabe-Ortiz
  • , German F. Alvarado
  • , Carlos Canelo-Aybar
  • , Jorge L. Maguiña
  • , Eddy R. Segura
  • , Antonio M. Quispe
  • , Edward S. Smith
  • , Angela M. Bayer
  • , Andres G. Lescano
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
  • Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
  • David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
  • U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6 (NAMRU-6)
  • Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health
  • Universidad de San Martín de Porres

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Scopus citations

Abstract

Plagiarism is a serious, yet widespread type of research misconduct, and is often neglected in developing countries. Despite its far-reaching implications, plagiarism is poorly acknowledged and discussed in the academic setting, and insufficient evidence exists in Latin America and developing countries to inform the development of preventive strategies. In this context, we present a longitudinal case study of seven instances of plagiarism and cheating arising in four consecutive classes (2011–2014) of an Epidemiology Masters program in Lima, Peru, and describes the implementation and outcomes of a multifaceted, “zero-tolerance” policy aimed at introducing research integrity. Two cases involved cheating in graded assignments, and five cases correspond to plagiarism in the thesis protocol. Cases revealed poor awareness of high tolerance to plagiarism, poor academic performance, and widespread writing deficiencies, compensated with patchwriting and copy-pasting. Depending on the events’ severity, penalties included course failure (6/7) and separation from the program (3/7). Students at fault did not engage in further plagiarism. Between 2011 and 2013, the Masters program sequentially introduced a preventive policy consisting of: (i) intensified research integrity and scientific writing education, (ii) a stepwise, cumulative writing process; (iii) honor codes; (iv) active search for plagiarism in all academic products; and (v) a “zero-tolerance” policy in response to documented cases. No cases were detected in 2014. In conclusion, plagiarism seems to be widespread in resource-limited settings and a greater response with educational and zero-tolerance components is needed to prevent it.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1183-1197
Number of pages15
JournalScience and Engineering Ethics
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Aug 2017

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Cheating
  • Graduate education
  • Peru
  • Plagiarism
  • Research integrity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Plagiarism, Cheating and Research Integrity: Case Studies from a Masters Program in Peru'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this