TY - GEN
T1 - Comparative analysis of GR2M, Temez and HEC-HMS Hydrological Models for runoff estimation in a high Andean basin
AU - Kate Flores Zuniga, Solange
AU - Junior Santos De La Cruz, Elkky
AU - Santos Hurtado, Sissi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 IEEE.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - In Peru, high Andean regions have a shortage of hydrometeorological data and monitoring stations, which generates uncertainty for water projects such as hydroelectric power generation, irrigation, among others, in order to satisfy needs for population. For this reason, precipitation-runoff hydrological models represent a way to estimate monthly mean flows based on precipitation, evapotranspiration and temperature data. Accordingly, this paper will develop three hydrological precipitation-runoff models GR2M, Temez and HEC-HMS, with PISCO satellite data provided by SENAMHI to determine monthly average flows. GR2M model shows good results in each one of the sub-basins under study. Furthermore, the Temez and HEC HMS models provide unsatisfactory results in the verification coefficients. GR2M model gave better results with the verification coefficients in each sub-basin: sub-basin 738 (PBIAS=-3.78, NSE=0.78, R2=0.79 and RSR=0.53), sub-basin 747 (PBIAS=-6.63, NSE=0.91, R2=0.91 and RSR=0.32) and sub-basin 773 (PBIAS=-2.79, NSE=0.66, R2= 0.63 and RSR=0.71). In conclusion, GR2M hydrological model has a better fit in selected high Andean basin areas due to its satisfactory verification coefficients.
AB - In Peru, high Andean regions have a shortage of hydrometeorological data and monitoring stations, which generates uncertainty for water projects such as hydroelectric power generation, irrigation, among others, in order to satisfy needs for population. For this reason, precipitation-runoff hydrological models represent a way to estimate monthly mean flows based on precipitation, evapotranspiration and temperature data. Accordingly, this paper will develop three hydrological precipitation-runoff models GR2M, Temez and HEC-HMS, with PISCO satellite data provided by SENAMHI to determine monthly average flows. GR2M model shows good results in each one of the sub-basins under study. Furthermore, the Temez and HEC HMS models provide unsatisfactory results in the verification coefficients. GR2M model gave better results with the verification coefficients in each sub-basin: sub-basin 738 (PBIAS=-3.78, NSE=0.78, R2=0.79 and RSR=0.53), sub-basin 747 (PBIAS=-6.63, NSE=0.91, R2=0.91 and RSR=0.32) and sub-basin 773 (PBIAS=-2.79, NSE=0.66, R2= 0.63 and RSR=0.71). In conclusion, GR2M hydrological model has a better fit in selected high Andean basin areas due to its satisfactory verification coefficients.
KW - GR2M model
KW - HEC-HMS model
KW - High Andean basin
KW - Temez model
KW - hydrological models
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85143706091
U2 - 10.1109/CONIITI57704.2022.9953651
DO - 10.1109/CONIITI57704.2022.9953651
M3 - Contribución a la conferencia
AN - SCOPUS:85143706091
T3 - 2022 Congreso Internacional de Innovacion y Tendencias en Ingenieria, CONIITI 2022 - Conference Proceedings
BT - 2022 Congreso Internacional de Innovacion y Tendencias en Ingenieria, CONIITI 2022 - Conference Proceedings
A2 - Morales, Victor Manuel Fontalvo
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2022 Congreso Internacional de Innovacion y Tendencias en Ingenieria, CONIITI 2022
Y2 - 5 October 2022 through 7 October 2022
ER -