TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of a Randomized Trial Comparing ICP-Monitor-Based Management of Severe Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury to Management Based on Imaging and Clinical Examination Without ICP Monitoring-Research Algorithms
AU - Chesnut, Randall
AU - Temkin, Nancy
AU - Pridgeon, James
AU - Sulzbacher, Stephen
AU - Lujan, Silvia
AU - Videtta, Walter
AU - Moya-Barquín, Luis
AU - Chaddock, Kelley
AU - Bonow, Robert H.
AU - Petroni, Gustavo
AU - Guadagnoli, Nahuel
AU - Hendrickson, Peter
AU - Ramírez Cortez, Grimaldo
AU - Carreazo, Nilton Yhuri
AU - Vargas Aymituma, Alcides
AU - Anchante, Daniel
AU - Caqui, Patrick
AU - Ramírez, Alberto
AU - Munaico Abanto, Manuel
AU - Ortiz Chicchon, Manuel
AU - Cenzano Ramos, José
AU - Castro Darce, María Del Carmen
AU - Sierra Morales, Roberto
AU - Brol Lopez, Pedro
AU - Menendez, Willy
AU - Posadas Gutierrez, Sofía
AU - Kevin, Vicente
AU - Mazariegos, Andrea
AU - de Leon, Elie
AU - Rodas Barrios, Rodolfo Enrique
AU - Rodríguez, Sandra
AU - Flores, Sandra
AU - Alvarado, Ovidio
AU - Guzman Flores, Luis José
AU - Moisa Martinez, Melvin
AU - Gonzalez, Pablo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2023. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/1/1
Y1 - 2024/1/1
N2 - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of our current approach to incorporating intracranial pressure (ICP) data into pediatric severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) management is incompletely understood, lacking data from multicenter, prospective, randomized studies. The National Institutes of Health-supported Benchmark Evidence from Latin America-Treatment of Raised Intracranial Pressure-Pediatrics trial will compare outcomes from pediatric sTBI of a management protocol based on ICP monitoring vs 1 based on imaging and clinical examination without monitoring. Because no applicable comprehensive management algorithms for either cohort are available, it was necessary to develop them. METHODS: A consensus conference involving the 21 intensivists and neurosurgeons from the 8 trial sites used Delphi-based methodology to formulate management algorithms for both study cohorts. We included recommendations from the latest Brain Trauma Foundation pediatric sTBI guidelines and the consensus-based adult algorithms (Seattle International Brain Injury Consensus Conference/Consensus Revised Imaging and Clinical Examination) wherever relevant. We used a consensus threshold of 80%. RESULTS: We developed comprehensive management algorithms for monitored and nonmonitored cohort children with sTBI. We defined suspected intracranial hypertension for the nonmonitored group, set minimum number and timing of computed tomography scans, specified minimal age-adjusted mean arterial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure targets, defined clinical neuroworsening, described minimal requisites for intensive care unit management, produced tiered management algorithms for both groups, and listed treatments not routinely used. CONCLUSION: We will study these protocols in the Benchmark Evidence from Latin America-Treatment of Raised Intracranial Pressure-Pediatrics trial in low- and middle-income countries. Second, we present them here for consideration as prototype pediatric sTBI management algorithms in the absence of published alternatives, acknowledging their limited evidentiary status. Therefore, herein, we describe our study design only, not recommended treatment protocols.
AB - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of our current approach to incorporating intracranial pressure (ICP) data into pediatric severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) management is incompletely understood, lacking data from multicenter, prospective, randomized studies. The National Institutes of Health-supported Benchmark Evidence from Latin America-Treatment of Raised Intracranial Pressure-Pediatrics trial will compare outcomes from pediatric sTBI of a management protocol based on ICP monitoring vs 1 based on imaging and clinical examination without monitoring. Because no applicable comprehensive management algorithms for either cohort are available, it was necessary to develop them. METHODS: A consensus conference involving the 21 intensivists and neurosurgeons from the 8 trial sites used Delphi-based methodology to formulate management algorithms for both study cohorts. We included recommendations from the latest Brain Trauma Foundation pediatric sTBI guidelines and the consensus-based adult algorithms (Seattle International Brain Injury Consensus Conference/Consensus Revised Imaging and Clinical Examination) wherever relevant. We used a consensus threshold of 80%. RESULTS: We developed comprehensive management algorithms for monitored and nonmonitored cohort children with sTBI. We defined suspected intracranial hypertension for the nonmonitored group, set minimum number and timing of computed tomography scans, specified minimal age-adjusted mean arterial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure targets, defined clinical neuroworsening, described minimal requisites for intensive care unit management, produced tiered management algorithms for both groups, and listed treatments not routinely used. CONCLUSION: We will study these protocols in the Benchmark Evidence from Latin America-Treatment of Raised Intracranial Pressure-Pediatrics trial in low- and middle-income countries. Second, we present them here for consideration as prototype pediatric sTBI management algorithms in the absence of published alternatives, acknowledging their limited evidentiary status. Therefore, herein, we describe our study design only, not recommended treatment protocols.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85180008527
U2 - 10.1227/neu.0000000000002760
DO - 10.1227/neu.0000000000002760
M3 - Artículo
C2 - 37955439
AN - SCOPUS:85180008527
SN - 0148-396X
VL - 94
SP - 72
EP - 79
JO - Neurosurgery
JF - Neurosurgery
IS - 1
ER -