TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of simulated intraoral erosion and/or abrasion effects on etch-and-rinse bonding to enamel
AU - Wang, Linda
AU - Casas-Apayco, Leslie C.
AU - Hipólito, A. C.
AU - Dreibi, Vanessa Manzini
AU - Giacomini, Marina Ciccone
AU - Bim Junior, O.
AU - Rios, Daniela
AU - Magalhães, A. C.
PY - 2014/2/1
Y1 - 2014/2/1
N2 - Purpose: To assess the influence of simulated oral erosive/abrasive challenges on the bond strength of an etch-and-rinse two-step bonding system to enamel using an in situ/ex vivo protocol. Methods: Bovine enamel blocks were prepared and randomly assigned to four groups: CONT - control (no challenge), ABR - 3x/day-l minute toothbrushing; ERO - 3x/day - 5 minutes extraoral immersion into regular Coca Cola; and ERO+ABR - erosive protocol followed by a 1-minute toothbrushing. Eight blocks were placed into an acrylic palatal appliance for each volunteer (n=13), who wore the appliance for 5 days. Two blocks were subjected to each of the four challenges. Subsequently, all the blocks were washed with tap water and Adper Single Bond 2/ Filtek Z350 were placed. After 24 hours, 1 mm2-beams were obtained from each block to be tested with the microtensile bond strength test (50 N load at 0.5 mm/minute). The data were statistically analyzed by one-way RM-ANOVA and Tukey's tests (a= 0.05). Results: No difference was detected among the ABR, ERO, and CONT groups (P> 0.05). ERO+ABR group yielded lower bond strengths than either the ABR and ERO groups (P< 0.0113).
AB - Purpose: To assess the influence of simulated oral erosive/abrasive challenges on the bond strength of an etch-and-rinse two-step bonding system to enamel using an in situ/ex vivo protocol. Methods: Bovine enamel blocks were prepared and randomly assigned to four groups: CONT - control (no challenge), ABR - 3x/day-l minute toothbrushing; ERO - 3x/day - 5 minutes extraoral immersion into regular Coca Cola; and ERO+ABR - erosive protocol followed by a 1-minute toothbrushing. Eight blocks were placed into an acrylic palatal appliance for each volunteer (n=13), who wore the appliance for 5 days. Two blocks were subjected to each of the four challenges. Subsequently, all the blocks were washed with tap water and Adper Single Bond 2/ Filtek Z350 were placed. After 24 hours, 1 mm2-beams were obtained from each block to be tested with the microtensile bond strength test (50 N load at 0.5 mm/minute). The data were statistically analyzed by one-way RM-ANOVA and Tukey's tests (a= 0.05). Results: No difference was detected among the ABR, ERO, and CONT groups (P> 0.05). ERO+ABR group yielded lower bond strengths than either the ABR and ERO groups (P< 0.0113).
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84898926017
M3 - Artículo
C2 - 24902402
AN - SCOPUS:84898926017
SN - 0894-8275
VL - 27
SP - 29
EP - 34
JO - American Journal of Dentistry
JF - American Journal of Dentistry
IS - 1
ER -