TY - GEN
T1 - Perceptions of higher education teachers about academic dishonesty in students within a virtual environment
AU - De Fatima Uceda, Sebastiana
AU - Perez, Jose
AU - Barros, Rossana
AU - Flores, Mayllorid
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 IEEE.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - This study had two aims. The first aim was to identify the perceptions that higher education teachers of an education faculty, in a virtual environment, have about the factors that influence the decisions of the students to carry out dishonest academic behaviors. The second aim was to identify what measures teachers implement to prevent dishonest behaviors. Academic dishonesty is understood as the set of attitudes and actions that have the purpose of deceiving another person, and are carried out when one wants to present an academic work as one's own when in reality it is not in this way, violating the norms of the institution [1]. The present work is a qualitative research of an exploratory nature and a phenomenological approach. Semi-structured interviews were used with eight teachers. Data was analyzed: first, the concept of academic dishonesty, then the mechanism used by teachers and the institution to deal with these behaviors; finally, individual and contextual factors that may influence the student's decision to perform a dishonest behavior.
AB - This study had two aims. The first aim was to identify the perceptions that higher education teachers of an education faculty, in a virtual environment, have about the factors that influence the decisions of the students to carry out dishonest academic behaviors. The second aim was to identify what measures teachers implement to prevent dishonest behaviors. Academic dishonesty is understood as the set of attitudes and actions that have the purpose of deceiving another person, and are carried out when one wants to present an academic work as one's own when in reality it is not in this way, violating the norms of the institution [1]. The present work is a qualitative research of an exploratory nature and a phenomenological approach. Semi-structured interviews were used with eight teachers. Data was analyzed: first, the concept of academic dishonesty, then the mechanism used by teachers and the institution to deal with these behaviors; finally, individual and contextual factors that may influence the student's decision to perform a dishonest behavior.
KW - academic cheating
KW - academic dishonesty
KW - academic fraud
KW - plagiarism
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85144124354
U2 - 10.1109/ICALTER57193.2022.9964728
DO - 10.1109/ICALTER57193.2022.9964728
M3 - Contribución a la conferencia
AN - SCOPUS:85144124354
T3 - Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies on Education and Research, ICALTER 2022
BT - Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies on Education and Research, ICALTER 2022
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2nd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies on Education and Research, ICALTER 2022
Y2 - 16 November 2022 through 19 November 2022
ER -