TY - JOUR
T1 - Practices and attitudes in the use of digital tools in the writing process among Peruvian university students of business administration
AU - Arias-Chávez, Dennis
AU - Sevillano, Luis Miguel Cangalaya
AU - Postigo-Zumarán, Julio E.
AU - Palaco-Vásquez, Juan Alfredo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© (2025), (Centro de Informacion Tecnologica). All rights reserved.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - This study describes the practices and attitudes of 350 business administration students from three universities from Lima (Peru), regarding the use of digital tools in the writing process. Using a quantitative, descriptive and cross-sectional approach, a single questionnaire is administered that addressed the use of digital tools, academic performance, and plagiarism detection, which are analyzed using the statistical software Jamovi. The results show that 63.7% of the students use tools for paraphrasing and 33.7% for drafting complete essays. Detection by instructors is low (35.1% for paraphrasing and 22% for essays), highlighting a significant gap in technological knowledge. Additionally, 74.6%of students are aware of a peer using these tools for paraphrasing and 56.3% for complete essays. In conclusion, attitudes toward the use of digital tools are ambivalent, with many students neither agreeing nor disagreeing, reflecting uncertainty about their academic and ethical impact.
AB - This study describes the practices and attitudes of 350 business administration students from three universities from Lima (Peru), regarding the use of digital tools in the writing process. Using a quantitative, descriptive and cross-sectional approach, a single questionnaire is administered that addressed the use of digital tools, academic performance, and plagiarism detection, which are analyzed using the statistical software Jamovi. The results show that 63.7% of the students use tools for paraphrasing and 33.7% for drafting complete essays. Detection by instructors is low (35.1% for paraphrasing and 22% for essays), highlighting a significant gap in technological knowledge. Additionally, 74.6%of students are aware of a peer using these tools for paraphrasing and 56.3% for complete essays. In conclusion, attitudes toward the use of digital tools are ambivalent, with many students neither agreeing nor disagreeing, reflecting uncertainty about their academic and ethical impact.
KW - academic integrity
KW - actitudes estudiantiles
KW - artificial intelligence
KW - digital tools
KW - educación superior
KW - herramientas digitales
KW - higher education
KW - integridad académica
KW - inteligencia artificial
KW - plagiarism
KW - plagio
KW - proceso de escritura
KW - student attitudes
KW - writing process
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105008897486
U2 - 10.4067/S0718-50062025000300121
DO - 10.4067/S0718-50062025000300121
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:105008897486
SN - 0718-5006
VL - 18
SP - 121
EP - 134
JO - Formacion Universitaria
JF - Formacion Universitaria
IS - 3
ER -